The ruling directly challenges National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang'ula's February decision to bar the legislator from the House, its precincts, committees and even his office over remarks made on live television.
Kibagendi had boldly claimed that Parliament had been auctioned and reduced to an appendage of State House accusing leadership of compromising the institution's independence.
Speaker Wetang'ula deemed the statements a breach of privilege and contempt imposing what many viewed as an extraordinarily punitive open ended penalty requiring a formal apology for readmission.
ODM Secretary General and Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna swiftly hailed the court's intervention as encouraging though he criticized the delay in delivering justice.
In his statement Sifuna described the Speaker's action as manifestly illegal and unconstitutional arguing that no Speaker holds authority to punish MPs for expressions made outside parliamentary proceedings.
He labeled it one of the gravest displays of impunity and abuse of power in Kenya's parliamentary history even observable to non-lawyers.
The decision underscores the judiciary's role as a vital check against legislative overreach safeguarding freedom of speech under Article 33 and MPs' privileges balanced against broader rights.
Public reactions on social media reflect widespread frustration with perceived executive influence over Parliament with calls mounting for greater Speaker accountability.
This reinstatement not only restores Kibagendi's voice for his constituents but signals that extramural criticism of institutional conduct cannot be silenced through indefinite exclusion.
As Kenya navigates tense political dynamics the ruling reinforces that the rule of law not unchecked authority must prevail in democratic spaces.
0 Comments