Some county lawmakers argue that the agreement amounts to an admission of failure to effectively manage devolved functions, claiming that the governor is ceding key responsibilities to the national administration.
The renewed impeachment push places Sakaja in a delicate position, especially given that the majority of seats in the Assembly are influenced by the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM).
Internal divisions within the party could further complicate efforts to either advance or block the motion if it is formally tabled.
It remains unclear whether President William Ruto will rally members of his United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party to shield Sakaja from the looming impeachment threat.
Critics have intensified calls for the governor’s resignation over the Sh80 billion cooperation agreement signed at State House, Nairobi, terming the deal controversial and rushed.
Azimio Coalition Executive Director Philip Kisia stated that by signing the document, the governor indirectly admitted incapacity to execute functions assigned to the county government.
Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna also disputed the Ksh.80 billion agreement, citing alleged legal breaches. In his statement, Sifuna questioned the lack of public participation and claimed that his office was not consulted prior to the signing.
Embakasi East MP Babu Owino echoed similar concerns, warning about the timing of the pact, coming slightly over a year to the next general elections.
He described the agreement as a “hostile takeover” and alleged that the process was rushed, denying Nairobi residents an opportunity to voice their views on the cooperation plan.
In September 2025, Kileleshwa MCA Robert Alai spearheaded a motion to impeach Sakaja, citing over 20 charges.
Governor Johnson Sakaja survived the impeachment motion following interventions by Ruto and former Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) leader, late Raila Odinga.
0 Comments