Kiharu Member of Parliament Ndindi Nyoro has, for the first time, openly explained why he did not support the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, a process that deeply divided Kenya’s political class last year.
Speaking during a recent media interview, Nyoro said his decision to stay away from the impeachment proceedings was guided by principle rather than political convenience.
He argued that the process lacked wisdom, proper consultation, and a clear assessment of the long-term impact on the country.
According to the MP, impeachment is a serious constitutional action that should not be rushed or driven by personal disagreements.
According to the MP, impeachment is a serious constitutional action that should not be rushed or driven by personal disagreements.
He said leaders ought to carefully weigh the consequences of such decisions, especially when they involve senior elected officials whose removal could destabilise governance and public trust.
“I felt that the country was not prepared for the aftermath of that decision,” Nyoro said.
“I felt that the country was not prepared for the aftermath of that decision,” Nyoro said.
“There was no thorough evaluation of how it would affect the people, institutions, and even the political environment going forward.”
Nyoro revealed that he privately advised colleagues to explore dialogue and ideological engagement instead of pursuing removal through Parliament.
Nyoro revealed that he privately advised colleagues to explore dialogue and ideological engagement instead of pursuing removal through Parliament.
However, he claims his views were ignored, leaving him isolated during a critical moment.
The Kiharu legislator also disclosed that his relationship with President William Ruto deteriorated significantly during that period.
The Kiharu legislator also disclosed that his relationship with President William Ruto deteriorated significantly during that period.
While he stopped short of blaming the Head of State directly, Nyoro admitted that communication between them broke down completely after he expressed reservations about the impeachment.
His remarks have drawn attention because Nyoro had remained largely silent when the impeachment motion was tabled and later passed.
His remarks have drawn attention because Nyoro had remained largely silent when the impeachment motion was tabled and later passed.
At the time, many political observers believed he was among leaders quietly supporting Gachagua’s removal, especially given his rising profile within government circles.
The motion to impeach Gachagua was introduced by Kibwezi East MP Mwengi Mutuse and sailed through Parliament in October.
The motion to impeach Gachagua was introduced by Kibwezi East MP Mwengi Mutuse and sailed through Parliament in October.
Supporters of the move argued that it was necessary to restore order within government, while critics warned it would deepen political divisions.
Nyoro’s political influence had grown steadily after President Ruto assumed office in September 2022.
Nyoro’s political influence had grown steadily after President Ruto assumed office in September 2022.
His strong performance in parliamentary committees and public finance debates positioned him as one of the most promising young leaders within the ruling coalition.
When Gachagua faced impeachment, speculation emerged that Nyoro was being considered as a possible replacement or future power broker. His silence during that time only fuelled rumours that he was part of the strategy behind the scenes.
However, his latest remarks challenge that narrative. Nyoro insisted that he neither plotted against the former deputy president nor supported his removal.
When Gachagua faced impeachment, speculation emerged that Nyoro was being considered as a possible replacement or future power broker. His silence during that time only fuelled rumours that he was part of the strategy behind the scenes.
However, his latest remarks challenge that narrative. Nyoro insisted that he neither plotted against the former deputy president nor supported his removal.
Instead, he chose to step back because he could not endorse a process he believed was poorly thought out.
“I warned that unresolved ideological differences could be managed, but personal conflicts would only harm the country,” he said.
“I warned that unresolved ideological differences could be managed, but personal conflicts would only harm the country,” he said.
“Unfortunately, that advice was not taken.”
Nyoro’s comments come at a time when the country is reflecting on political accountability and leadership maturity, especially during moments of national tension.
Nyoro’s comments come at a time when the country is reflecting on political accountability and leadership maturity, especially during moments of national tension.
His stance has earned mixed reactions, with some praising his principled approach while others accuse him of political fence-sitting.
0 Comments