The Orange Democratic Movement is facing renewed internal scrutiny after party leader Dr Oburu Oginga publicly accused Secretary General Edwin Sifuna of blurring the line between personal opinion and official party policy, a dispute that has exposed growing rifts within the opposition outfit ahead of the 2027 General Election.

In a statement dated February 6, 2026, Oburu responded to remarks made by Sifuna during an interview on Citizen TV’s The Explainer, where the Nairobi Senator questioned the legitimacy of party leadership structures and the direction of ODM’s political strategy. 

Sifuna’s comments touched on sensitive issues including the broad-based political arrangement, the authority of party organs before a National Delegates Conference, and speculation over a possible coalition between ODM and the ruling UDA party.

Oburu maintained that ODM policy is not shaped by individual leaders but emerges from structured deliberations conducted through constitutionally mandated party organs that guide decision-making.

While acknowledging that ODM encourages open debate as a democratic movement, Oburu warned that such discussions must remain anchored in the party’s founding values to avoid confusing members and supporters.

He further challenged Sifuna’s claims about the legality of certain office holders, noting that the Secretary General himself was elected by the National Governing Council in 2018 before being endorsed by the NDC in 2022.

According to Oburu, it is contradictory for Sifuna to question processes that previously legitimised his own leadership within the party.

The ODM leader also defended ongoing pre-coalition talks, arguing that early engagement with other parties is a strategic move rather than a sign of panic.

Oburu stressed that dialogue with government and stakeholders remains essential in advancing the rights and interests of Kenyans.

The controversy deepened after Sifuna alleged that high-profile Linda Ground rallies were funded through parallel channels not sanctioned by ODM headquarters.

These claims have fuelled debate over transparency, control, and influence within the party’s mobilisation efforts.